|
|

Contact: Robin Gross, IP Justice
Executive Director
Email: robin at ipjustice dot org
IP Justice Speech at
2005 World Summit of the Information
Society (WSIS)
General Plenary (7th Session)
18 November 2005
Thank you Mr. President, your Excellencies, and distinguished
participants.
I represent IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization
that promotes balanced intellectual property law and freedom of
expression in cyberspace.
What an exciting time we live in! The Internet has created an
unprecedented opportunity to distribute knowledge, culture, and
information to all, at near zero cost.
How lucky we are to witness the emergence of this tool that enables the
free exchange of ideas, creativity among citizens, and education for
the impoverished.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees all citizens the
right to freedom of expression in any medium, regardless of
frontiers. Although written half a century ago, this pledge
foreshadows the struggles we now face over cyberspace. On the Internet,
we must fight just to hold on to the same freedoms long guaranteed in
traditional space.
One of the greatest threats to freedom of expression in an information
society is over-zealous efforts to control intellectual property.
Let’s be clear: Intellectual property rights are not human rights, they
are government created private monopolies on information. If
calibrated too high, these monopolies stifle the very creativity they
were designed to foster.
The global trend is to increase the duration and the scope of IPR
‘protections’, while eroding the limitations to those monopolies.
These policies overwhelmingly benefit wealthy countries, at the expense
of the poorer nations. To name just a few:
- Today we have laws
that outlaw discussing or publishing information that could be used to
bypass “digital locks” on media. Computer scientists have been
threatened with litigation, and in some cases, even imprisoned.
- Facts can now be
“owned” under new database rights that wall off public information for
the exploitation of a single company.
- Copyright terms are
endlessly extended to prevent works from ever passing into the public
domain, where all may freely benefit from them.
- Trademark rights
over Internet domain names are routinely used to attack online free
speech.
- Software patents
threaten technological innovation, as small businesses are afraid to
write software that might use a proprietary algorithm.
Yes, we can build an
information society with greater restrictions on the free flow of
information. But at what cost? We must recognize the costs
to society of these monopolies and weigh them against their
benefits.
We want an information society that encourages collaboration through
free and open source software, or the Creative Commons’ sharing of
music, video, and text.
We want business models that actually pay creators a living wage. We
can do better than the lip-service currently paid to creators by
publishers who own, exploit, and control our culture.
We need policies that create a vibrant and robust public domain from
which all receive cultural and intellectual nourishment.
We face a crucial question: Will we build an information society
with more fences, taller walls, and stronger chains? Or will we
create a new world that encourages collaboration, innovation,
creativity, and sharing of knowledge?
Will we be guided by our fear of the uncertainties of new
technologies? Or by our hope for the possibilities of a future
information society? The choice is ours and the stakes are
high. Thank you.
View Other
Language Translations of Video:
Arabic
Chinese
French
Russian
Spanish
Original
- English

|
|
|
Read the
Principles of
IP Justice
and Sign-on!
|
|
1.
|
We reserve the right to control our individual experience of intellectual property.
| |
2.
|
Creators deserve to be compensated.
| |
3.
|
We reserve our right to make private copies of lawfully acquired intellectual property.
| |
4.
|
Technology and information that enable the exercise of rights should be lawful.
| |
5.
|
"Copy Rights" come with "Copy Responsibilities."
| |
|